Standards
How we earn trust: accuracy, independence, clear sourcing, and a public corrections record.
Global AI News publishes AI industry intelligence for builders, founders, and policy practitioners. These standards apply to the Daily Brief and to original essays. They are not marketing copy — they are the rules we use when deciding what to publish, update, or kill.
We verify claims against primary sources before publishing. Briefings summarize and link out; essays argue from cited facts. We do not invent quotes, metrics, or product capabilities. When a claim is contested or unverified, we say so in plain language instead of burying the uncertainty.
Editorial decisions are not for sale. Sponsored or partner content — if any — is labeled clearly. Coverage is not steered by advertisers, investors, or political interests. Product placement, affiliate blurbs, and “partner posts” that look like news are not how we run the brief.
Briefings always point to the original publisher. Essays name authors with bios and lead with the takeaway. When AI assists drafting or summarization, we remain accountable for the final published text — humans own the byline and the record. Readers should be able to check our work without guessing where a claim came from.
Writers disclose material conflicts (employment, equity, client work) relevant to a story. When a conflict cannot be managed, we reassign or kill the piece. Personal opinions belong in essays, not in briefing cards presented as neutral summaries.
Factual errors are corrected promptly and logged on our corrections page. Judgment calls and opinion updates are not listed as corrections. Reach the desk at editorial@globalainews.in. For how to reach us on tips or partnerships, see Contact. For who we are, see About.