Key takeaways
- Last week, two Chinese AI companies unveiled models they say can credibly compete with the best systems from OpenAI and Anthropic.
- For years, we have been warned that China was catching up in AI.
- ai and DeepSeek seen as highly competitive with top-tier offerings from US labs like Anthropic and OpenAI.
What happened
Last week, two Chinese AI companies unveiled models they say can credibly compete with the best systems from OpenAI and Anthropic. The response was swift and predictable. Markets wobbled, commentators declared Silicon Valley shooketh, and policymakers reached for the familiar language of arms races and wake-up calls.
Beijing has also been keen to support homegrown AI efforts, including incentivizing and funding innovation and cracking down on firms trying to shed their ties to China. Meanwhile, Washington’s AI strategy has often veered between heavy-handed intervention that has left allies questioning America’s reliability and a laissez-faire assumption that markets will see things right.
It is a difficult approach to maintain against a competitor prepared to mobilize the full force of the state behind a single technological goal. 6 Sol and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5. 6 Sol and $50 for Fable 5. Demand was so strong after the launch that Moonshot, the company claimed, that it temporarily paused new subscriptions after the service was overwhelmed. The majority of responses mainly focus on this release.
Why it matters
” Bloomberg described it as a “surprise breakthrough” that is “roiling markets” and sending global tech stocks tumbling over concerns it could force US firms to rethink their gargantuan spending on data centers, chips, and other AI infrastructure. ”, referring to the Chinese model that blindsided the US AI industry last year.
Xprize founder Peter Diamandis went as far to call the release America’s “AI Sputnik moment,” referring to the Soviet satellite launch at the height of the Cold War that encouraged significant US investment in its science and space programs.
Of course, DeepSeek was also widely described as America’s AI Sputnik moment, a comparison that felt less gratuitous then as DeepSeek appeared to arrive with little warning, challenged the prevailing assumptions about the costs of frontier AI, and prompted immediate reactions across the technology and financial sectors. What is actually surprising is that the model announcements were a surprise at all.
For years, we have been warned that China was catching up in AI. Yet the world is shocked when it starts to look like the moment may have arrived. US and Chinese companies train almost all of the world’s most-used AI models, and six of the top 10 AI tools on OpenRouter’s leaderboard tracking token consumption and benchmarks were Chinese.
ai and DeepSeek seen as highly competitive with top-tier offerings from US labs like Anthropic and OpenAI. Chinese models are also significantly cheaper to use, and reports suggest US companies are increasingly turning to Chinese tools as the cost of using domestic providers surge.
What to watch
8. ” This only added to the uproar Kimi K3 had caused. Crucially, both companies plan to make their new flagship models publicly available. Both Moonshot and Alibaba say they plan to release their models as open weight, which would allow developers to download, use, and modify the core values created during the AI’s training that shape its responses.
It stands in stark contrast to the closed, proprietary approach to frontier models taken by most leading US AI labs, including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. The




