The government refuted a report on Sunday that claimed "India proposes forcing smartphone makers to give source code" as part of a security overhaul."
The report further claimed that the move led to behind-the-scenes opposition from giants like Apple and Samsung.
The Reuters report quoted four people familiar with the discussions and a review of "confidential government and industry documents" to make the claim.
Notably, smartphone makers closely guard their source code. Apple declined China's request for source code between 2014 and 2016, and US law enforcement has also tried and failed to get it.
"This is a part of regular and routine consultations with the industry for any safety or security standards. Once a stakeholder consultation is done, then various aspects of security standards are discussed with the industry," the government said while fact-checking the Reuters report.
It said, "No final regulations have been framed, and any future framework will be formulated only after due consultations."
Meanwhile, mobile phone manufacturing players also told news agency PTI that the move is just a routine consultation between the government and the industry.
Sources told PTI that the IT ministry is holding discussions with stakeholders under the Indian Telecom Security Assurance Requirements (ITSAR), which was framed by the National Centre for Communication Security (NCCS) under the Department of Telecommunications (DoT).
ITSAR broadly covers safety standards for telecom network gear, including those related to software updates and the source code of communication devices.
"Based on the ITSAR standard, Meity has been authorised to handle safety issues related to mobile phones, and there is a smooth conversation going on with industry players. The process has just started, and there is no mandate that the government has issued or is pressing for," one of the sources told PTI.
Apple, South Korea's Samsung, Google, China's Xiaomi and MAIT, the Indian industry group that represents the firms, did not respond to PTI's requests for comment.
Editorial Context & Insight
Original analysis and synthesis with multi-source verification
Methodology
This article includes original analysis and synthesis from our editorial team, cross-referenced with multiple primary sources to ensure depth, accuracy, and balanced perspective. All claims are fact-checked and verified before publication.
Primary Source
Verified Source
mint - news
Editorial Team
Senior Editor
David Kim
Specializes in Business coverage
Quality Assurance
Associate Editor
Fact-checking and editorial standards compliance
