Technologyabout 14 hours ago3 min read

The Pentagon formally labels Anthropic a supply-chain risk

TV

Byline

The Verge

Technology Correspondent

Covers technology developments with editorial context for decision-focused readers.

The Pentagon formally labels Anthropic a supply-chain risk
Image source: The Verge

Why it matters

Though the designation is typically applied to foreign companies with ties to adversarial governments, this is the first time that an American company has publicly received this label.

Key takeaways

  • The negotiations grew ugly, however, as the Pentagon increasingly threatened to use the supply-chain risk designation should Anthropic refuse to comply with their demands.
  • After Anthropic announced last Thursday that they would not comply, the Pentagon made good on that threat.
  • Anthropic did not immediately return a request for comment.)It is unclear how broadly the Pentagon will attempt to apply their enforcement of this designation.

After weeks of failed negotiations, public ultimatums, and lawsuit threats, the Defense Department has formally labeled Anthropic a “supply-chain risk”, escalating its fight with the AI company over their acceptable use policies and potentially bringing their fight to court.

The decision, first reported by The Wall Street Journal on Thursday, citing one source familiar, will bar defense contractors from working with the government if they use Claude, Anthropic’s AI program, in their products. Though the designation is typically applied to foreign companies with ties to adversarial governments, this is the first time that an American company has publicly received this label.

In a post on the company blog published on Thursday evening, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei confirmed that they had received the notification from the Pentagon on Wednesday. “As we wrote on Friday, we do not believe this action is legally sound, and we see no choice but to challenge it in court,“ he stated.

At the heart of the conflict is Anthropic’s refusal to allow the Pentagon to use Claude for two purposes: autonomous lethal weapons without human oversight, and mass surveillance. The Pentagon has argued that Anthropic’s demands for control over government usage would place too much power in the hands of a private company, while Anthropic was not reassured that the government would respect their red lines. The negotiations grew ugly, however, as the Pentagon increasingly threatened to use the supply-chain risk designation should Anthropic refuse to comply with their demands. After Anthropic announced last Thursday that they would not comply, the Pentagon made good on that threat. (The Pentagon did not comment on the record. Anthropic did not immediately return a request for comment.)

It is unclear how broadly the Pentagon will attempt to apply their enforcement of this designation. On Friday, when he announced his intent to label Anthropic a risk, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that any company that performed “any commercial activity” with Anthropic —even outside their work for the Pentagon — would have their defense contracts cancelled. At the time, Anthropic stated in response that such a broad application of the law would be illegal.

Hegseth and President Donald Trump set a 6-month deadline for Anthropic to remove Claude from government systems, but it won’t be easy, especially from the military. After the U.S. attacked Iran over the weekend, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a targeted missile strike, reports indicated that Claude-powered intelligence tools played a major role in the success of the mission.

Update, March 5: Added statement from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

    The VergeVerified

    Curated by Shiv Shakti Mishra

    Sources & Further Reading

    Key references used for verification and additional context.

    Verification

    Grade D1 unique evidence links

    Publisher: The Verge

    Source tier: Tier 2

    Editorial standards: Our process

    Corrections: Report an issue

    Published: Mar 5, 2026

    Read time: 3 min

    Category: Technology