COP30: A Summit Marred by Division
The COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil, concluded amidst deep divisions, marking it as one of the most contentious in three decades of such gatherings. The central point of contention was the omission of any commitment to phase out fossil fuels, a point of frustration for many nations but a victory for others who benefit from their production.
This summit served as a stark reminder of the fractured global consensus on addressing climate change. Despite Brazil's efforts to foster collaboration, significant disagreements persisted throughout the negotiations.
Fossil Fuel Fight: A Road Not Taken
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva initially championed a roadmap away from fossil fuels, an idea supported by countries like the UK. However, COP President André Corrêa do Lago prioritized consensus, recognizing that a strong push on fossil fuels would likely derail the talks. Initial drafts referencing a roadmap were quickly removed, despite attempts by Colombia, the EU, and approximately 80 other nations to introduce language signaling a move away from coal, oil, and gas.
A Brazilian-led "mutirão," intended to foster discussion, instead exacerbated the divisions. Arab nations refused to engage with proponents of fossil fuel phase-out, and major producers rebuffed the EU's efforts. A Saudi delegate reportedly stated that energy policy was determined in their capital, not Brussels. Ultimately, Brazil proposed non-binding roadmaps on deforestation and fossil fuels outside the formal COP framework, a move applauded but of uncertain legal standing.
European Union's Waning Influence
The EU's performance at COP30 was widely criticized. While advocating for a fossil fuel roadmap, they were constrained by prior commitments. The agreement to triple funding for climate adaptation, already included in earlier drafts, limited their leverage in negotiations. Li Shuo of the Asia Society observed a decline in the EU's power, reflecting a shift in global dynamics towards BASIC and BRICS countries. Despite attempts to adjust the timeline for increased adaptation finance, the EU achieved minimal progress on the fossil fuel issue.
The Future of the COP Process
The summit raised fundamental questions about the COP process itself. Critics questioned the value of large-scale gatherings focused on minute details, while others lamented that crucial discussions occurred at late hours, involving sleep-deprived delegates.
While the COP process facilitated the Paris Agreement, many participants now believe it lacks a clear purpose. Harjeet Singh of the Fossil Fuel Treaty Initiative suggested that supplementary processes outside the COP system are necessary. With energy costs and net-zero emissions strategies increasingly critical, the COP process appears disconnected from the daily concerns of billions.
Brazil attempted to refocus the summit on implementation and the "energy agenda," but the meaning of these concepts remained unclear. COP leaders recognize the need for a new approach to maintain the conference's relevance.
Trade and Climate: A Growing Intersection
For the first time, global trade emerged as a central issue, driven by the EU's plan to introduce a carbon border tax on high-carbon products. Trading partners like China, India, and Saudi Arabia oppose this measure, arguing that it unfairly disadvantages their exports. The EU defends the tax as a means to protect domestic producers subject to emissions fees. The issue was ultimately deferred to future discussions, with the final agreement establishing an ongoing dialogue on trade involving governments and organizations like the World Trade Organization.
China and the US: Divergent Approaches, Similar Impacts
While the US, under former President Trump’s influence, maintained a distance, Russia actively blocked progress on roadmaps. Saudi Arabia and other oil producers predictably resisted curbing fossil fuels. China, however, adopted a low profile, focusing on securing economic advantages. Experts suggest that China's business activities will ultimately outweigh the impact of US efforts to promote fossil fuels.
Li Shuo noted China's focus on financial gains, particularly in the solar energy sector, positioning them favorably in the long term. This dominance in renewable energy puts the US in a challenging position.
Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to get exclusive insight on the latest climate and environment news from the BBC's Climate Editor Justin Rowlatt, delivered to your inbox every week. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.
